Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate Social Responsibility

April 22, 2020

The question of how to reconcile profitability with social responsibility is a central issue that has long been discussed across disciplines. Against the background of growing public attention to social and environmental standards as well as the fight against corruption in developing countries, the issue of corporate social responsibility (CSR) also raises important legal questions.

“To date, most work on CSR has come from economics and the social sciences. But the debate surrounding the social responsibility of companies touches on fundamental questions of company law”, says Institute Director Holger Fleischer, whose working group at the Institute has for several years researched CSR in order to provide critical input on future proposed reforms.

Liability for human rights abuses by corporations

Prof. Dr. Holger Fleischer

Alarming abuses in the supply chains of multinational corporate groups have prompted the question of whether domestic parent companies must bear responsibility for human rights violations committed by their subsidiaries abroad.

Working together with Institute Senior Research Fellow Stefan Korch, Holger Fleischer has conducted a comparative analysis of the legal situation in Germany, the UK and France. In all three legal systems, it is widely agreed that corporations are not per se subject to any special rules in tort. However, a closer analysis shows that individual factors can work in combination to produce distinct obligations.

“As with the UK and France, in Germany under the rules of the general tort law of the Civil Code, every legal entity is in principle responsible only for its own conduct and its own sphere of activity,” Fleischer says. “For this reason, the question of whether the company-wide due diligence obligations of the parent company come into consideration regarding harmful actions by subsidiaries must be scrutinised in each individual case. This becomes relevant if the parent company is directly involved in the subsidiary’s risk management or gives it instructions in a high-risk setting. A further issue that may be brought to bear in the overall assessment of the case circumstances is the gravity of the impending legal infringement.”


Holger Fleischer, Stefan Korch, Konzerndeliktsrecht: Entwicklungsstand und Zukunftsperspektiven, Der Betrieb 2019, 1944–1952.

Responsibility along global supply chains

Legal issues surrounding CSR gained a new urgency when the Rana Plaza garment factory collapsed in Bangladesh in 2013. This tragedy took the lives of 1,138 people and triggered a worldwide debate about procuring companies’ responsibility in global supply chains.

Dr. Stefan Korch

In particular, legal proceedings in the Rana Plaza case have focused on the issue of whether companies must take responsibility for their foreign suppliers’ misconduct or for their own negligence. Building on their analysis of corporate liability, Holger Fleischer and Stefan Korch have investigated the extent to which companies are accountable for misconduct occurring in their supply chains under German, French, British and US tort law.

“The four legal systems are in agreement that accountability under tort law applies only in exceptional cases,” says Stefan Korch. “This occurs when, for example, the procuring company directs the supplier as if it were a dependent operating unit. But even in a tightly forged supply chain, involvement alone is insufficient to establish liability for the actions of suppliers.”


Holger Fleischer, Matthias Pendl, Verschwiegenheitspflicht und Pflicht zum Geheimnismanagement von Geschäftsleitern, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2020, 1321–1330.

New legal forms for social entrepreneurship

The company forms available under today’s German company law already offer several options for entrepreneurs who wish to orient their businesses to both profit and the common good. Unlike its counterparts in the UK and the majority of US states, however, German company law does not provide a special legal form for such entrepreneurs.

Julia Tittel

Julia Tittel, Research Associate at the Institute, is exploring in her dissertation project the question of whether German lawmakers should follow the lead of the US and UK by also introducing a special company form for socially oriented companies and, if so, what specific form it might take.

“It’s fascinating to me to observe how the traditional division between commercially oriented companies on the one hand and purely non-profit associations on the other hand appears to be fading away,” Tittel says. “I’m interested in how company law could respond to this trend. Looking beyond borders gives us illuminating sources of inspiration – in terms of both the reasons for introducing a new company form and the ways it might be configured.”


Further Reading

Holger Fleischer, Unternehmensinteresse und intérêt social: Schlüsselfiguren aktienrechtlichen Denkens in Deutschland und Frankreich, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht 2018, 703–734.
Holger Fleischer, Comparing Unternehmensinteresse and Intérêt Social: A Guided Tour through Last Century's Corporate Law History in Germany and France, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Financier 4 (2018), 2–9.
Holger Fleischer, Jakob Hahn, Berichtspflichten über menschenrechtliche Standards in der Lieferkette – eine internationale Bestandsaufnahme, Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 2018, 397–405.
Holger Fleischer, Susanne Kalss, Hans-Ueli Vogt (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility. Achtes deutsch-österreichisch-schweizerisches Symposium (Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, 123), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2018, XV + 344 pp.
Holger Fleischer, Corporate Social Responsibility – Vermessung eines Forschungsfeldes aus rechtlicher Sicht, Die Aktiengesellschaft 62 (2017), 509–525.
Holger Fleischer, Nadja Danninger, Konzernhaftung für Menschenrechtsverletzungen – Französische und schweizerische Reformen als Regelungsvorbilder für Deutschland? –, Der Betrieb 2017, 2849–2857.
Holger Fleischer, Gesetzliche Unternehmenszielbestimmungen im Aktienrecht – Eine vergleichende Bestandsaufnahme –, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht 46 (2017), 411–425.
Holger Fleischer, Walther Rathenau: Vom Aktienwesen – Eine geschäftliche Betrachtung (1917), Juristenzeitung 2017, 991–994.

Other Interesting Articles

Go to Editor View